Episode 2: The Disappearance of Lauren Spierer

Now Streaming

EPISODE SUMMARY

In this episode, we examine the disappearance of Lauren Spierer, a 20-year-old Indiana University student who vanished in the early morning hours of June 3, 2011, in Bloomington, Indiana.

Lauren has never been found.

There has been no body recovered, no publicly named suspect through a criminal charging process, and no criminal charges filed. Although the case remains classified as an open missing-person investigation, law enforcement has not publicly released the investigative file or underlying evidentiary materials.

Rather than speculating, this episode focuses on the only detailed, publicly available narrative of Lauren’s final hours: the timeline as it appears in federal civil court records and later appellate review.

After years passed without criminal resolution, Lauren’s parents turned to civil court, not to accuse anyone of murder or assign criminal guilt, but to ask whether the law allowed them to compel answers through discovery. That litigation produced federal court filings, judicial opinions, and appellate rulings that summarize the alleged events of Lauren’s final night and explain why the legal process ultimately stopped.

This episode does not attempt to solve Lauren Spierer’s disappearance.
It examines what happens when every legal path to answers is exhausted, and the system stops responding.

HOW THIS EPISODE IS DIFFERENT

Lauren Spierer’s disappearance is still classified as an open missing-person investigation. As a result:

There is no criminal court proceeding

No publicly filed probable cause affidavit

No trial testimony

No criminal discovery record

No formal public explanation of what happened after Lauren was last seen

The timeline presented in this episode is not a court finding and not tested evidence.

It is a reconstruction drawn from allegations summarized in federal civil court filings and later recapped by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Throughout the episode, you will hear language such as:

“According to the Entry on Motions to Dismiss…”

“As stated in the Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Response…”

“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled…”

That language matters. Courts apply precise legal standards, and allegations are sometimes assumed true only for the limited purpose of deciding whether the law allows a case to proceed.

KEY TOPICS COVERED

Lauren Spierer’s last documented movements on the night of June 2–3, 2011

The limitations of publicly available evidence in open investigations

The role of federal civil court in seeking answers when criminal proceedings stall

Alleged events as summarized in civil court filings

The motion-to-dismiss standard and why courts sometimes assume allegations without testing them

Discovery limits and why full evidentiary development never occurred

The Seventh Circuit’s appellate ruling and legal reasoning

The distinction between criminal investigation, civil litigation, and public access

How open cases can remain legally unreachable for families

Casewalker analysis of procedural silence and systemic limits

THE CASEWALKER EVIDENCE BOOK

For this episode, we built what we call a Casewalker Evidence Book.

An Evidence Book is not speculation.
It is not theory.
And it is not hindsight.

It is a structured walk through:

What exists in the public record

What does not

And where the legal process reached its limits

Every name, location, timeline entry, and legal decision discussed in this episode is tied directly to a source.

Allegations are clearly identified as such, and no facts are presented as established unless supported by the record.

IMPORTANT CONTEXT FOR LISTENERS

The individuals named in this episode were not charged with crimes.

Allegations discussed were assumed true only for limited legal purposes and were never tested at trial.

No findings of criminal wrongdoing were made by any court.

All persons mentioned are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.

This episode discusses procedural outcomes, not conclusions about guilt.

MISSING PERSON SPOTLIGHT

🕊️LAUREN SPIERER

Age at Disappearance: 20

Height: Approximately 4’11”

Weight: Approximately 90 lbs

Hair / Eyes: Blonde/Blue

Lauren Spierer was last seen in the early morning hours of June 3, 2011, walking south near 11th Street and College Avenue in Bloomington, Indiana.

She was not wearing shoes and did not have her cell phone.

She has never been found.

HOW TO SHARE INFORMATION

If you have information related to Lauren Spierer’s disappearance, you are encouraged to contact:

Bloomington Police Department: 812-339-4477

Email: policetips@bloomington.in.gov

Indiana State Police: 812-332-4411

Crime Stoppers (Anonymous):

800-222-TIPS (8477)

Online or via the P3 Tips mobile app

Emergency: Call 911

Even information that feels insignificant could matter.

SOURCES & DOCUMENTATION

This episode is based on publicly available records and verified sources, including:

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Entry on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss

Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order

Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motions

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (2015)

Opinion affirming dismissal and summary judgment

Indiana State Police Missing Person Bulletin

Bloomington Police Department public materials (as referenced in filings)

FindLauren.com (family-maintained public awareness site)

The Doe Network — Missing Person Case ID: 4096DFIN

A full Evidence Book and one-page source index for this episode are available on our website.

CONTENT DISCLAIMER

This episode discusses missing persons, legal proceedings, and unresolved investigations.
Listener discretion is advised.

All information presented is sourced from publicly available documents, verified law-enforcement publications, court filings, or is clearly identified as allegation when applicable.

The Casewalker Chronicles does not speculate on guilt and does not accuse any individual or group of criminal conduct unless legally established by court judgment.

FOLLOW & CONNECT

Instagram: @TheCasewalkerChronicles

Facebook: The Casewalker Chronicles

Website: www.thecasewalkerchronicles.com

Email: casewalkerchronicles@gmail.comnicles